Steering Committee

• Prof. Muhammad Halim Natsir (Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia)
• Rizki Prafitri, Ph.D. (Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia)
• Dr. Agus Susilo (Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia)

Scientific Committee

• Prof. Simon Oosting (WUR, Netherlands)
• Prof. Joey Lee (NPUST, Tropical Agriculture and International Cooperation, Taiwan)
• Prof. Kusmartono (Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia)
• Ir. Syafri, MBA. (CP, Foundation)
• Dr. Eko Widodo (Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia)
• Prof. V. M. Ani Nurgiartiningsih (Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia)
• Prof. Suyadi (Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia)
• Dr. Marjuki (Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia)

Organizing Committee

• Prof. Muhammad Halim Natsir (Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia)

Chairman

• Eko Nugroho, PhD. (Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia)

Vice Chairman

• Dr. Irida Novianti (Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia)

Treasurers

• Asri Nurul Huda, M.Sc. (Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia)
• Khoiron Nisaa, S.Kom. (Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia)

Secretary

• Danung Nur Adli, M.Pt., M.Sc. (Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia)
• Rahardianti Ariestya Puspita, S.Pt. (Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia)

Secretariat

• Dr. Premy Puspitawati Rahayu(Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia)
• Faizal Andri, M.Pt. (Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia)
• Muhammad Pramujo, M.Si. (Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia)
• Jaisy Aghniarahim Putritamara, MP. (Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia)

Division of Event

• Dr. Herly Evanuarini (Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia)
• Ir. Poespitasari Hazanah Ndaru, MP (Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia)

Division of Sponsors

• Dr. Nanang Febrianto (Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia)
• Aulia Puspita Anugra Yekti, MP., M.Sc. (Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia)

Publications and IT

• Mochamad Tono, A.Md. (Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia)
• Muhammad Zaenal Abidin (Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia)

1. The topic of paper must fit to the scope of the conference.
2. The submitted paper must be original research or literature review and should not have been previously published or presented at another conference.
3. Following the ethical conduct is critical, any act of plagiarism cannot be tolerated. If an author is found to commit a plagiarism, the submission will be dismissed. All submitted paper are screened using Turnitin to prevent plagiarism malpractices.
4. The paper should be written in English (US) with font type Times New Roman and A4 Paper size (209.9 x 297.04 mm) in doc. or docx. format.
5. Paper must have the names of all authors (each author to be marked with superscript Arabic number such as 1, 2) with their affiliation addresses and email address of corresponding author.
6. The paper should be written with a minimum of 4 pages and no maximum limit on paper page counts.
7. Paper content is recommended to be consisted of the following parts:
   • Original Research: Abstract, Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results and Discussion, Conclusion, Acknowledgment (if any), and References.
   • Literature Review: Introduction, Main Body, Conclusion, Acknowledgment (if any), and References.
8. Make sure that all figures have a good resolution, at least in a 300 DPI.
9. For both primary and co-authors, credentials along with their full names and email addresses must be included. If co-authors are from different institutions, the secondary institution(s) and the institution investigators are associate with must be listed.
10. Please proofread your paper before submission to eliminate spelling and grammatical errors. Authors may use proofreading service for final checking the paper.

Review Procedure

The reviews were single-blind. Each submission was examined by at least 2 reviewers independently. The submissions were first screened for generic quality and suitableness. After the initial screening, they were sent for peer review by matching each paper’s topic with the reviewers’ expertise, taking into account any competing interests. A paper could only be considered for acceptance if it had received favourable recommendations from the two reviewers. Authors of a rejected submission were given the opportunity to revise and resubmit after addressing the reviewers’ comments. The acceptance or rejection of a revised manuscript was final.

Quality Criteria

Reviewers were instructed to assess the quality of submissions solely based on the academic merit of their content along the following dimensions:

1. Pertinence of the article’s content to the scope and themes of the conference;
2. Clear demonstration of originality, novelty, and timeliness of the research;
3. Soundness of the methods, analyses, and results;
4. Adherence to the ethical standards and codes of conduct relevant to the research field;
5. Clarity, cohesion, and accuracy in language and other modes of expression, including figures and tables.

In addition, all of the articles will be checked using Turnitin for textual overlap in an effort to detect possible signs of plagiarism. The maximum similarity rate allowed is 25 percent.